From Newsgroup: comp.os.msdos.misc
On 4/14/19 9:41 AM, T. Ment wrote:
A retro hobby is worthwhile, if it teaches you something useful. Like Fortran, COBOL, Pascal, C, Assembly, i.e., mainstream computer science material.
I largely agree. Substitute "something you want to learn" in place of "useful" and I completely agree.
Something doesn't /need/ to be "useful" to have "value".
VBDOS Pro does not qualify.
VBDOS may not be /teach/ something useful. But it may /do/ something
useful.
Do something worthwhile. Learn assembly. Disassemble old shareware to reverse engineer it. Fix the bugs. There's an endless supply of bugs to
fix in old software.
If Harry wants to use VBDOS to create an interface / wrapper for
something he uses (2MF) to make his use thereof easier, well in my book, that's useful.
Or if the act of creating said interface / wrapper he learns more about
2MF, then VBDOS did something useful. Even if it wasn't /teaching/
something about itself.
Harry has sufficiently demonstrated that he wants to do some things that
I question the usefulness of. But, he wants to do them, and asks
questions. If I can answer, who am I to judge how useful the
information is to someone else?
We each blaze our own path. Some of our paths are significantly
different than other people's paths. So what.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
--- Synchronet 3.17c-Linux NewsLink 1.110